First, give conclusions that can be used for decision-making
The scope of the operation includes infrastructure, model services, data knowledge, application interfaces, quality and safety. The frequent upgrade of the model should be determined by operational effectiveness and compatibility, without having to follow each new version; however, the gaps, drivers, capacity and dependency must be managed. It can be absorbed by an internal team, implementer or hosting service, but account numbers, backups and emergency authority should remain under the control of the enterprise.
What conditions need to be identified before judgement is made?
The same question may have different answers under different business, data and project phases. It is suggested that the following conditions be checked and that the common findings on the web be incorporated into their own projects.
Suggested order of advance
First, we'll be clear about the target and the border.
Establishment of a four-tier inventory of infrastructure, models, applications and knowledge assets.
Validation Key Dependence
Configure capacity, performance, error, cost and security monitoring.
Development of assessable outcomes
Development of upgrades, returns, backups, recovery and emergency response processes.
Make sure you decide the next step with the real results.
Reassess quality, resources, malfunctions and operational usage on a monthly basis.
How do you understand it in the actual business?
The local deployment model of the enterprise is used for contract support. After the contract template and regulations change on line, the GPS driver also needs patches. If the server is maintained online, and no update of knowledge and regression tests is carried out, the system still exports outdated proposals.
The easiest pit to step on.
To interpret privatization as the deployment of a permanent use
Model upgrade does not apply back
Backup only file, no validation model services and configuration restoration
How should we end up receiving and confirming?
Monthly reports are required to show both usability, delay, resources, failure, effectiveness and risk of being processed.
When preparing to communicate with suppliers or internal teams, it is recommended that current processes, representative samples, existing systems, planning time and budget levels be brought. First, the unknown items are clearly marked, and then the decision is made to use diagnostics, PoC, fixed-range projects or ongoing research and development, which is usually more reliable than a direct demand for a price and duration without borders.