Home / FAQs / Business information selection, integration and data governance
QUESTION & ANSWER

ERP Standard Product vs. Custom Development

Common processes such as finance, procurement, inventory, etc. should normally prioritize the assessment of mature ERPs, not all of which are not agreed to from zero. The unique business rules of the enterprise, external platforms, and on-site equipment may need to be expanded or independently customized. The choice is not between “standards or customizations”, but rather, to identify which processes accept standardization and which capabilities constitute competitive advantages. Process and differences analysis is first followed by the determination of product configuration, secondary development and peripheral custom borders.

Answer the question.

First, give conclusions that can be used for decision-making

Standard products have accounting rules, authority and upgrade systems, but enterprises need to adjust part of the process; fully customized and more compatible operations, but they undertake continuous maintenance and compliance updates. The common viable path is ERP management to stabilize the main process, unique operations to be achieved in peripheral systems, and to synchronize clients, orders, inventories and financial vouchers through API. Any two developments should assess future escalation conflicts.

DECISION FACTORS

What conditions need to be identified before judgement is made?

The same question may have different answers under different business, data and project phases. It is suggested that the following conditions be checked and that the common findings on the web be incorporated into their own projects.

Extent of variance between core and industry standard processesProduct configuration, extension interface and secondary development capacityUser size, organizational changes and cross-corporate accounting needsTotal cost of implementation, licensing, upgrade, customization and long-term transportation
ACTION STEPS

Suggested order of advance

01

First, we'll be clear about the target and the border.

To comb through existing processes, pain points, matters that must be retained and that can be standardized.

02

Validation Key Dependence

The real business scene requires a demonstration of the candidate product rather than a functional list.

03

Development of assessable outcomes

(c) Forming standard functions, configurations, secondary sections and outer system boundaries.

04

Make sure you decide the next step with the real results.

Validation of data, people and processes through small-scale pilot replication.

PRACTICAL EXAMPLE

How do you understand it in the actual business?

Example used to illustrate the method of judgement

A chain of firms can use mature ERPs to process procurement and finance, while door-to-door equipment linkages and special promotions are achieved on the business platform. By working together through a clear interface of goods, doors, orders and vouchers, both parties retain unique capabilities and avoid re-engineering generic finance modules.

COMMON RISKS

The easiest pit to step on.

Only the number of software functions, do not verify the true process

To adapt old habits to standard products.

Ignore data cleansing, training and organizational process adjustments

ACCEPTANCE

How should we end up receiving and confirming?

The selection conclusion should include a slide presentation, a gap list, an integration range, data migration, permission and total cost for three years. The acceptance and inspection also check if the user can complete the end-to-end business, rather than simply confirm that the menu exists.

When preparing to communicate with suppliers or internal teams, it is recommended that current processes, representative samples, existing systems, planning time and budget levels be brought. First, the unknown items are clearly marked, and then the decision is made to use diagnostics, PoC, fixed-range projects or ongoing research and development, which is usually more reliable than a direct demand for a price and duration without borders.

Your project conditions are different from the examples above?

Operational objectives, existing systems, sample and planned time could be collated before consultants could make preliminary judgements in relation to actual boundaries.

Associate project consultants