Home / FAQs / Applet and APP filing, uploading and technical selection
QUESTION & ANSWER

Wechat Mini Program Filing Review Time

The time for the review of the Platform, SMS and the Authority’s audit is influenced by information, regions and business lines, and cannot be committed to a fixed number of days. Development schedules are listed independently of file, cataloguing, privacy settings and code review.

Answer the question.

First, give conclusions that can be used for decision-making

The small program operates in the development of tools, which does not mean that it can be published directly. The enterprise needs to confirm that the registered subject, service content, catalogue, domain name, server and privacy statement are consistent, and may need to be pre-qualified in the case of medical, educational, news, financial, etc. The time of review is uncertain, and the return of information, name conflicts and non-conformity of the category extends the cycle, and therefore the filing should be relied on as the project rather than the last step after the development is completed.

DECISION FACTORS

What conditions need to be identified before judgement is made?

The same question may have different answers under different business, data and project phases. It is suggested that the following conditions be checked and that the common findings on the web be incorporated into their own projects.

Consistency between the actual operator and the file owner of the appletIs a permit or pre-approval required for service linesAvailability of domain names, servers, privacy policies and user information processingWhether the uplink date retains the buffer for filing and Platform review
ACTION STEPS

Suggested order of advance

01

First, we'll be clear about the target and the border.

Identification of subjects, names, services and required qualifications.

02

Validation Key Dependence

Prepare domain names, HTTPS, servers and platform authentication information.

03

Development of assessable outcomes

Submission of files and necessary verifications in accordance with the guidelines of the Platform.

04

Make sure you decide the next step with the real results.

The file is completed and code clearance is submitted and feedback processed.

PRACTICAL EXAMPLE

How do you understand it in the actual business?

Example used to illustrate the method of judgement

The business completes the development of a transactional applet and finds that the business category requires additional qualifications and that the original activity date cannot be online. If the project is started, the material is prepared simultaneously, and the code function is not consistent with the declared content.

COMMON RISKS

The easiest pit to step on.

Use of individual subjects to carry actual business without assessing limitations

It's not necessary to deal with small programs alone because the website is already on the list of ICPs.

Development completed before privacy policy, domain name and qualification is prepared

ACCEPTANCE

How should we end up receiving and confirming?

The online preparation should check the status of filing, the subject rights, the white list of domain names, HTTPS, privacy settings, user protocols, type qualifications and official versions.

When preparing to communicate with suppliers or internal teams, it is recommended that current processes, representative samples, existing systems, planning time and budget levels be brought. First, the unknown items are clearly marked, and then the decision is made to use diagnostics, PoC, fixed-range projects or ongoing research and development, which is usually more reliable than a direct demand for a price and duration without borders.

Your project conditions are different from the examples above?

Operational objectives, existing systems, sample and planned time could be collated before consultants could make preliminary judgements in relation to actual boundaries.

Associate project consultants