First, give conclusions that can be used for decision-making
Technical routes affect development efficiency, end-end experience, plugin dependence, debugging, and long-term recruitment maintenance. Common forms, queries, and business processes are suitable for cross-repeat; bluetooth, audio-visual, back-office positioning, complex animation, and system-level capabilities focus on verifying the quality of plugins and the cost of primary extension.
What conditions need to be identified before judgement is made?
The same question may have different answers under different business, data and project phases. It is suggested that the following conditions be checked and that the common findings on the web be incorporated into their own projects.
Suggested order of advance
First, we'll be clear about the target and the border.
Terminal and equipment capabilities with the highest risk are listed.
Validation Key Dependence
Producing a real business prototype for the same business with candidate technology.
Development of assessable outcomes
Test performance, plugins, debugging and publishing in target equipment.
Make sure you decide the next step with the real results.
Comparison of three-year iterative, upgrading and primary expansion costs.
How do you understand it in the actual business?
The inspection of the APP is mostly a form, but must be continuously located and connected to Bluetooth devices under a weak net. The team should verify the backstage positioning, breakwire reconnection, and data synchronization with the candidate frame, rather than completing dozens of regular pages before detecting the instability of the core plugin.
The easiest pit to step on.
Critical equipment capacity was not validated solely because of the development of the speed selection framework
It's not considered that the cross-end code requires platform adaptation at all.
Reliance on long-term unmaintained third-party plugins
How should we end up receiving and confirming?
The technical selection report should include prototypes, equipment compatibility, performance, plugins and licences, and release processes and risks.
When preparing to communicate with suppliers or internal teams, it is recommended that current processes, representative samples, existing systems, planning time and budget levels be brought. First, the unknown items are clearly marked, and then the decision is made to use diagnostics, PoC, fixed-range projects or ongoing research and development, which is usually more reliable than a direct demand for a price and duration without borders.