Planning and system selection

Enterprise AI Model vs. Process First

Enterprise AI should start with business tasks and process results, not with the first procurement model. When processes are confused and data are not subject to liability, AI will only magnify inconsistencies. First, it will identify users, input, expected results, manual clearance and system actions, then select models, RAGs, rules or automated routes using real samples.

ZhiHua Tech Original Course2 minutes 31 secondsFAQs and solutions in enterprise informatization

This video is used for enterprise-infomatic knowledge learning and internal discussions.

DIRECT ANSWER

Let's see what we can do.

Enterprise AI should start with business tasks and process results, not with the first procurement model. When processes are confused and data are not subject to liability, AI will only magnify inconsistencies. First, it will identify users, input, expected results, manual clearance and system actions, then select models, RAGs, rules or automated routes using real samples.

VIDEO NOTES

The video content of this issue is read

The following are structured textual interpretations of the video for the current period, which allow for quick reading, internal discussion and search; it is not verbatim subtitled. Around “businesses should use AI first, model or process first”, it is suggested that a distinction be made between symptoms, business causes and system improvements before deciding whether process adjustments, data governance, system integration, automation or customization development are required.

1. How the AI scenario should be defined

The process itself is confusing and data is not accountable. First, it identifies users, inputs, expected results, manual clearances and system actions, then selects models, RAGs, rules or automated routes using real samples. For this point of judgement, the actual tasks, documents, communication records or system logs should be drawn to check frequency, waiting time, back-to-work costs, responsible positions and exceptions.

2. Why processes and data preparation precede models

The process itself is confusing and data is not accountable. First, it identifies users, inputs, expected results, manual clearances and system actions, then selects models, RAGs, rules or automated routes using real samples. For this point of judgement, the actual tasks, documents, communication records or system logs should be drawn to check frequency, waiting time, back-to-work costs, responsible positions and exceptions.

3. How to control first-stage inputs with the PoC

The process itself is confusing and data is not accountable. First, it identifies users, inputs, expected results, manual clearances and system actions, then selects models, RAGs, rules or automated routes using real samples. For this point of judgement, the actual tasks, documents, communication records or system logs should be drawn to check frequency, waiting time, back-to-work costs, responsible positions and exceptions.

WORKFLOW DESIGN

What should we do with this scene?

The first step in the project is to determine what information projects should do, in terms of size, construction route, product selection and AI entry points. The first step is to define real input, desired output, tool privileges, manual clearance, unusual handling and operational acceptance indicators, and then decide whether to use rules, scripts, API, Codex or other AIAgents, around whether an enterprise wants to use AI.

01How should the AI scene be defined?

The verification of conditions, liability, data sources and exceptions is done using real samples, and the presentation is not used as a substitute for production evidence.

02Why processes and data preparation precede models

The verification of conditions, liability, data sources and exceptions is done using real samples, and the presentation is not used as a substitute for production evidence.

03How to control the first input with the PoC

The verification of conditions, liability, data sources and exceptions is done using real samples, and the presentation is not used as a substitute for production evidence.

IMPLEMENTATION PATH

Suggested paths for improvement

  1. 1
    Recovery status process and cost baseline

    Selecting recent and representative tasks and anomalies, identifying participants, input outputs, time and current costs.

  2. 2
    Prioritization by value, risk and conditions of implementation

    Distinction between actions that are self-executing, that require manual confirmation and that prohibit automatic processing.

  3. 3
    First, try a quantitative closed ring.

    Start with the draft, a copy or a limited scene, and keep the abnormal transferer and retreat.

  4. 4
    Extension or re-routing of routes through data decisions

    Continuous observation of accuracy, adoption, processing cycle, error and real business results.

ACCEPTANCE

How to automate the receipt and inspection is really effective.

The acceptance cannot be based solely on whether a single demonstration runs. The following results should be observed continuously using independent samples and real anomalies, and pre-modification baselines of the same calibre should be maintained:

  • Whether core processes are really shortened
  • Whether key data form a uniform calibre
  • Continued use of staff
  • Reconciling input, operating cost and business value

The authorization, approval, audit and manual takeover must also be verified when it comes to the amount, customer commitment, privacy, compliance, production change or deletion operations.

RELATED RESOURCES

Continue to learn about the programmes