Planning and system selection

Rebuild System vs. System Integration

The system is not well used, and may not necessarily need to be re-engineered, but rather duplicated, missing interfaces or ageing local modules. Re-adaptation is appropriate to the situation where core structures and maintenance capacity are no longer able to support operations, and integration is appropriate to the situation where the system's main body is still available but is broken.

ZhiHua Tech Original Course2 minutes 40 secondsFAQs and solutions in enterprise informatization

This video is used for enterprise-infomatic knowledge learning and internal discussions.

DIRECT ANSWER

Let's see what we can do.

The system is not well used, and may not necessarily need to be re-engineered, but rather duplicated, missing interfaces or ageing local modules. Re-adaptation is appropriate to the situation where core structures and maintenance capacity are no longer able to support operations, and integration is appropriate to the situation where the system's main body is still available but is broken.

VIDEO NOTES

The video content of this issue is read

The following are structured textual interpretations of the video for the current period, which allow for quick reading, internal discussion and search; it is not word-for-word subtitles. Around “business should re-engineer a system or access existing systems”, it is suggested that a distinction be made between appearances, business causes and system improvements before deciding whether process adjustments, data governance, system integration, automation or custom development are required.

1. What signals indicate the need for reconstruction

The system is not well used, and may not necessarily need to be re-engineered, but simply duplicated, missing interfaces or ageing local modules. Re-establishing the core architecture and maintenance capacity is no longer able to support operations, integrating into the situation where the system's main body is still available but is broken.

2. Which issues can be addressed through integration

The system is not well used, and may not necessarily need to be re-engineered, but simply duplicated, missing interfaces or ageing local modules. Re-establishing the core architecture and maintenance capacity is no longer able to support operations, integrating into the situation where the system's main body is still available but is broken.

3. How to control the risks of migration and dual-track operation

The system is not well used, and may not necessarily need to be re-engineered, but simply duplicated, missing interfaces or ageing local modules. Re-establishing the core architecture and maintenance capacity is no longer able to support operations, integrating into the situation where the system's main body is still available but is broken.

WORKFLOW DESIGN

What should we do with this scene?

The first step in the project is to determine the size of the enterprise, the route of construction, the product selection and the entry point for AI. The first step is to define whether the rules, scripts, API, COdex or other AI Agents should be used, by defining real input, desired output, tool privileges, manual approval, unusual handling and operational acceptance indicators.

01What signals are needed to rebuild?

The verification of conditions, liability, data sources and exceptions is done using real samples, and the presentation is not used as a substitute for production evidence.

02Which problems can be solved through integration?

The verification of conditions, liability, data sources and exceptions is done using real samples, and the presentation is not used as a substitute for production evidence.

03How to control migration and dual-track operating risks

The verification of conditions, liability, data sources and exceptions is done using real samples, and the presentation is not used as a substitute for production evidence.

IMPLEMENTATION PATH

Suggested paths for improvement

  1. 1
    Recovery status process and cost baseline

    Selecting recent and representative tasks and anomalies, identifying participants, input outputs, time and current costs.

  2. 2
    Prioritization by value, risk and conditions of implementation

    Distinction between actions that are self-executing, that require manual confirmation and that prohibit automatic processing.

  3. 3
    First, try a quantitative closed ring.

    Start with the draft, a copy or a limited scene, and keep the abnormal transferer and retreat.

  4. 4
    Extension or re-routing of routes through data decisions

    Continuous observation of accuracy, adoption, processing cycle, error and real business results.

ACCEPTANCE

How to automate the receipt and inspection is really effective.

The acceptance cannot be based solely on whether a single demonstration runs. The following results should be observed continuously using independent samples and real anomalies, and pre-modification baselines of the same calibre should be maintained:

  • Whether core processes are really shortened
  • Whether key data form a uniform calibre
  • Continued use of staff
  • Reconciling input, operating cost and business value

The authorization, approval, audit and manual takeover must also be verified when it comes to the amount, customer commitment, privacy, compliance, production change or deletion operations.

RELATED RESOURCES

Continue to learn about the programmes