Planning and system selection

SaaS vs. Private Deployment Total Cost

SaaS is not a comparison with privatization only of the first year’s prices. SaaS includes continuous upgrading and service capacity, while privatization increases server, security, transport, version upgrades and personnel input.

ZhiHua Tech Original Course2 minutes 46 secondsFAQs and solutions in enterprise informatization

This video is used for enterprise-infomatic knowledge learning and internal discussions.

DIRECT ANSWER

Let's see what we can do.

SaaS is not a comparison with privatization only of the first year’s prices. SaaS includes continuous upgrading and service capacity, while privatization increases server, security, transport, version upgrades and personnel input.

VIDEO NOTES

The video content of this issue is read

The following are structured textual interpretations of the video for the current period, which allow for quick reading, internal discussion and search; it is not verbatim subtitles. Around “SaaS subscriptions and the lower long-term costs of the pirvate deproyment”, it is suggested that a distinction be made between the appearances, the causes of operations and the conditions for system improvement before deciding whether process adjustments, data governance, system integration, automation or customization development are required.

1. One-time costs and long-term operating costs

SaaS is not a price comparison with privatization alone. SaaS includes continuous upgrading and service capacity, while privatization increases server, security, mobility, version upgrades and personnel input.

2. Impact of data security and customization needs

SaaS is not a price comparison with privatization alone. SaaS includes continuous upgrading and service capacity, while privatization increases server, security, mobility, version upgrades and personnel input.

3. Total cost measurement methodology for three to five years

SaaS is not a price comparison with privatization alone. SaaS includes continuous upgrading and service capacity, while privatization increases server, security, mobility, version upgrades and personnel input.

WORKFLOW DESIGN

What should we do with this scene?

The first step in the project is to determine what information projects should be about, inter alia, the size of the enterprise, the route of construction, the product selection and the entry point for AI. The long-term costs surrounding the "SaaS subscription and the price of the project are lower" should be defined first, with the expectation of a genuine input, output, tool privileges, manual approval, unusual processing and operational acceptance indicators, before deciding whether to use the rules, scripts, API, Codex or other AIAgent.

01One-time and long-term operating costs

The verification of conditions, liability, data sources and exceptions is done using real samples, and the presentation is not used as a substitute for production evidence.

02Impact of data security and customization requirements

The verification of conditions, liability, data sources and exceptions is done using real samples, and the presentation is not used as a substitute for production evidence.

03Total cost measurement method for three to five years

The verification of conditions, liability, data sources and exceptions is done using real samples, and the presentation is not used as a substitute for production evidence.

IMPLEMENTATION PATH

Suggested paths for improvement

  1. 1
    Recovery status process and cost baseline

    Selecting recent and representative tasks and anomalies, identifying participants, input outputs, time and current costs.

  2. 2
    Prioritization by value, risk and conditions of implementation

    Distinction between actions that are self-executing, that require manual confirmation and that prohibit automatic processing.

  3. 3
    First, try a quantitative closed ring.

    Start with the draft, a copy or a limited scene, and keep the abnormal transferer and retreat.

  4. 4
    Extension or re-routing of routes through data decisions

    Continuous observation of accuracy, adoption, processing cycle, error and real business results.

ACCEPTANCE

How to automate the receipt and inspection is really effective.

The acceptance cannot be based solely on whether a single demonstration runs. The following results should be observed continuously using independent samples and real anomalies, and pre-modification baselines of the same calibre should be maintained:

  • Whether core processes are really shortened
  • Whether key data form a uniform calibre
  • Continued use of staff
  • Reconciling input, operating cost and business value

The authorization, approval, audit and manual takeover must also be verified when it comes to the amount, customer commitment, privacy, compliance, production change or deletion operations.

RELATED RESOURCES

Continue to learn about the programmes