Home / Services / Enterprise management system implementation, customization development and integration: ERP, CRM, OA, MES, WMS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE

ERP CRM Implementation Integration

Enterprises that are suitable for customers, orders, procurement, inventory, production, projects, personnel, equipment and financial data, which are scattered in tables or multiple systems. First, judge which processes are used for mature products and which differential capabilities need to be customized or redeveloped, and then form sustainable business closed loops through master data, interfaces and migration.

Client, order, supply, production and refund process traceableReduction of duplication of maintenance and manual transmission of data across systemsRational division of labour between standard products and differentiated operationsMigration and interface anomalies can be reconciled to recoverSystem configuration, source code and data take over
ERP CRM OA MES WMS and Enterprise Management Systems integration
Project decision-making conclusions

How the enterprise management and business system should be activated

The common process prioritizes the assessment of mature products such as ERP, CRM, OA, WMS; differentiated channels, manufacturing, delivery or service capacity are re-configured, secondary development, peripheral customization and systemization.

START WITH EVIDENCE

From preliminary judgement to acceptance and acceptance delivery

The level of uncertainty is reduced by stages before deciding on the scale of inputs and the modalities of cooperation.

Phase 1

Diagnostics and selection

Identification of processes, master data and system responsibilities

(c) Combine the differences between key players, existing forms and systems, data calibres, interface conditions and enterprises that must be retained.

Phase 2

Configure and Integrated

Run through a terminal to the end of the business loop.

Complete product configuration, necessary secondary development, master data governance, API interface, privileges and representative data migration.

Phase 3

Test and Handover

Bringing together operations, data and transport for acceptance

Regular and unusual sample alignments are used to complete reconciliation, training, switching, retreat, monitoring and continuous optimization arrangements.

CLIENT INPUTS

Recommendation pre-commencement readiness

Description of primary data on customers, commodities, materials, organization and ordersCurrent processes for sales, procurement, inventory, production, projects, delivery and financeList of existing ERP, CRM, OA, MES, WMS and financial softwareSize, quality and retention requirements for historical dataThird-party interface documents, account numbers and intercom ownersAccess window, target audience and acceptance officer
ACCEPTANCE EVIDENCE

Evidence to be seen in the acceptance.

Key business closed loops run by validation processMain data unique source and synchronized direction clearNormal, repetitive, time-out and failure interfaces are recordedNumber, amount and status of migration completedRole rights, approval and operational logs are compliantConfiguration, interface, deployment, operation and transport information to take over
Boundary of cooperation and responsibility

Standard product licences, implementation consultants, third-party interfaces, cloud resources and industry compliance costs need to be identified separately; the client is responsible for business rules, base data and internal change decisions, and ZhiHua Tech is contracted to undertake diagnostics, configuration development, integration migration, testing on-line and interface.

Problems that enterprises usually face

Purchased by system name, lack of end-to-end business and data planning

Repeated conflicts between customer, material, commodities, organization and project codes in different systems

Sales, orders, warehousing, production, delivery and finance remain hand-delivered

Secondary development lacks expansion and upgrade strategies, and updates often fail

Uplink acceptance only page, unverified migration, reconciliation, permissions and abnormal recovery

Our core services

01

Survey of enterprise systems status, product selection, blueprint planning and variance analysis

02

ERP, CRM, OA/BPM, HRM and Project Synergy System Implementation and Customization

03

Supply chain and compliance systems building SCM, SSM, OMS, WMS, TMS

04

MES, APS, QMS, EAM/CMMS, PLM, systems integration

05

Finance, budget, fee control, funds, invoices, contract and payment system connections

06

Main data MDM, data platform, BI business analysis and cockpit management construction

07

API, information, single-point login, role privileges, approval, logbooks and monitoring

08

Historical data cleansing migration, piloting, batch switching, training and continuous transport

PROJECT DECISION PATH

Continue to judge in the context of current projects

The service boundaries, budget bases and modalities of implementation for different phases of the project are not identical and can be further assessed in conjunction with the following.

Project deliverables

The final delivery boundaries are defined according to the scope of services, the construction phase and the modalities of cooperation, and are described below as common results.

DELIVERABLEBlueprint of business processes and system responsibilities
DELIVERABLEProduct selection and variance analysis reports
DELIVERABLEConfigure List, Secondary Development Source and Interface Services
DELIVERABLEMain data standards, mapping and migration scripts
DELIVERABLEIntermodal, reconciliation, authority and acceptance records
DELIVERABLEDeployment Switch, Back, Operation and Transport Document

How the project budget is assessed

Service coverage and business closure required for the first phase: enterprise system status diagnosis, product selection, blueprint planning and variance analysis, ERP, CRM, OA/BPM, HRM and project synergy system implementation and customization

Level of integrity of existing codes, data, systems, equipment and documents, and scope of coverage to be audited, relocated or re-engineered

Number of third-party interfaces, coordination responsibilities, data quality, unusual compensation and external supplier cooperation

Non-functional requirements such as performance, availability, security, authority, audit, compliance and access windows

Delivery depth and long-term responsibility: interlocking, reconciliation, authority and acceptance records, deployment switch, retreat, operation and transport of the file, and quality assurance, transport of peacekeeping continuity ranges

These circumstances do not recommend immediate initiation of full development.

Project objectives, responsible persons and acceptance criteria are not established

Key accounts, data, interfaces or business authorizations not available

Only the maximum price or very short cycle is sought, and the necessary tests and quality control are not accepted

IMPLEMENTATION PLAYBOOK

How the enterprise management and business system moves from demand to acceptable results

The following are used to explain the implementation methodology, the data calibre and the boundaries of responsibility, and are not used as a proxy for project judgement by functional lists.

Keywords and description of content

This page contains organizational content around real service issues such as enterprise management system development, enterprise business system customization, project management system, contract management system. Keywords are used to help users and search system identify themes, not to represent commitments to fixed effects; final scope, cycle, budget and indicators are based on project diagnostics, contracts and acceptance baselines.

DELIVERY PATH

Implementation and delivery pathways

Each stage has clear objectives, participatory roles and assessable outcomes, and important decisions are not left to the end of the project.

01Business diagnostics and status inventory
02Product selection and variance analysis
03Prototype configuration and interface design
04Second development and data preparation
05Consisting migration and commissioning
06Formally switching and continuity
FAQ

FAQs

The most common issues before cooperation are clearly stated in advance.

ERP buys standard products or custom development?+

Common processes such as finance, procurement and inventory usually prioritize the assessment of mature products; business differentiation in sales, channels, services or production capacity can be integrated with secondary development, peripheral systems and interfaces, avoiding placing all rules at the ERP core.

Can CRM be connected to existing ERP and financial systems?+

Yes. First, it is necessary to determine which system is responsible for the customer, commodity, order and refund, and then to design the field map, the single key, the synchronized direction, the repeat request and the failure compensation.

Does history data have to be fully migrated?+

Not necessarily. The main data, unfinished business, recent history and archived data should be distinguished from the needs of queries, audits and operations, and the migration results should be validated through sampling and volume reconciliations.

Can ERP or CRM be taken over after failure?+

The licences, configurations, secondary development codes, databases, interfaces, account numbers and implementation files can be taken first, and then the diagnosis will determine whether to continue repair, re-implement or phase-in.

What other enterprise systems can be built than ERP and CRM?+

Systems such as OA/BPM, HRM, SCM/SRM, OMS/WMS/TMS, MES/QMS/EAM, PLM, FC, Master Data and BI can be planned and implemented according to business needs, and can also be accessed and redeveloped.

Do professional systems like MES and WMS have to be developed from zero?+

Not necessarily. Processes prioritize mature products and industry options when they are more standard; and select configuration, plugin, peripheral customization or development when special processes, equipment, warehousing strategies or cross-system processes are present.

SYSTEM CAPABILITY MAP

Mainstream enterprise systems that can be planned, implemented, customized and integrated

The system name is only an entry point and formal programmes still need to be identified in the context of industry processes, existing products, data base and first-period business objectives.

Capacity boundaries

Specific product licences, original plant services, industry certification and third-party fees are recognized separately by project.

DECISION FAQ

Common issues related to current projects

Check out all 265 questions.
Corporate information selection, integration and data governance

ERP buys standard products or custom development?

Common processes such as finance, procurement, inventory, etc. should normally prioritize the assessment of mature ERPs, not all of which are not agreed to from zero. The unique business rules of the enterprise, external platforms, and on-site equipment may need to be expanded or independently customized. The choice is not between “standards or customizations”, but rather, to identify which processes accept standardization and which capabilities constitute competitive advantages. Process and differences analysis is first followed by the determination of product configuration, secondary development and peripheral custom borders.

View full answer
Business Info, Systems integration and Transport

What should be done to get ERP, CRM, OA and financial systems in place?

Most systems can be integrated through API, news, timing or controlled file exchanges, but first by confirming interface capacity and data responsibility. Each core type of data should have a single primary responsibility system, and other systems should read or write back as agreed. Important links also need to be addressed, for example, through retesting, compensation, logs and manual reconciliation. The system is connected only as a first step, and long-term consistency and unusual operations are more important.

View full answer
Corporate information selection, integration and data governance

How should data inconsistencies in multisystems be addressed?

The client, commodity, organization, inventory and order may be the primary responsibility of the different systems, with clear coding, calibration, synchronization and timing. Historical differences require an inventory, cleansing and manual validation, and no batch script can be used to conceal the root causes.

View full answer
Enterprise operations and operations management system

How can projects, contracts, costs, billing and refunds be made in a system?

The main line of contract and project should be the harmonization of the relationship between the client, contract, project, milestone, cost target, invoice and refund. The scope of operations system management, delivery and settlement processes, and the financial system should maintain formal accounting and supporting documentation.

View full answer