First, give conclusions that can be used for decision-making
Data consistency governance includes business calibre, master data, interface compacts, synchronization mechanisms and operational responsibility. Not all scenarios are necessary for strong consistency, but users must know when data will be valid and how to compensate for failure. Key data, such as orders and payments, should be reconciled using the only business number, typologies, status machines and regular reconciliations, avoiding double-entry and status coverage.
What conditions need to be identified before judgement is made?
The same question may have different answers under different business, data and project phases. It is suggested that the following conditions be checked and that the common findings on the web be incorporated into their own projects.
Suggested order of advance
First, we'll be clear about the target and the border.
Inventory system, data objects, field calibre and authoritative sources.
Validation Key Dependence
Define harmonized codes, interface contracts, synchronized direction and time limits.
Development of assessable outcomes
The migration results are verified through sample reconciliations.
Make sure you decide the next step with the real results.
Establish monitoring, retesting, discrepancy reporting and accountability closed loops.
How do you understand it in the actual business?
CRM allows changes in the name of the customer, and ERP allows changes, which can result in repeated conflicts between the two parties.
The easiest pit to step on.
Do a two-way sync without a primary responsibility system
Only current discrepancies are repaired and no processes resulting in discrepancies are repaired
The interface is successful, and it's a consistent view of business data.
How should we end up receiving and confirming?
The acceptance and inspection is to select the key object for end-to-end creation, modification, deletion, repetition, disorder and failure compensation tests, and to continue running the reconciliation of discrepancies, confirming that the person responsible can detect and process anomalies.
When preparing to communicate with suppliers or internal teams, it is recommended that current processes, representative samples, existing systems, planning time and budget levels be brought. First, the unknown items are clearly marked, and then the decision is made to use diagnostics, PoC, fixed-range projects or ongoing research and development, which is usually more reliable than a direct demand for a price and duration without borders.