First, give conclusions that can be used for decision-making
The difference between the two routes is mainly at the product boundary rather than whether or not a large model is called. The stock system upgrades retain ERP, CRM, OA or industry software as the primary system, allowing AI to read context, generate recommendations or execute controlled actions through interfaces; the AI primary product uses model interactivity, tool call, feedback data and quality as the main product link. For internal efficiency, gradual integration is usually more secure; for market-oriented new assistants, workstations or SaaS, AI raw MVPs can be built first, but firm rules and manual bottoms remain.
What conditions need to be identified before judgement is made?
The same question may have different answers under different business, data and project phases. It is suggested that the following conditions be checked and that the common findings on the web be incorporated into their own projects.
Suggested order of advance
First, we'll be clear about the target and the border.
Lists the complete path to the current user task.
Validation Key Dependence
The decision is whether AI should be embedded in the original entrance or form an independent product.
Development of assessable outcomes
The same set of real tasks is used to compare two types of interactive and integrated costs.
Make sure you decide the next step with the real results.
First, the minimum closed loop, then expanded on the basis of the rate of adoption and operational results.
How do you understand it in the actual business?
If the company is to sell a set of smart-priced products abroad, it should be based on uploading information, matching rules, generating proposals, manual approvals, and customer delivery to design independent AI original applications. The examples do not represent the performance of a particular customer, and the actual conclusions need to be verified in conjunction with the enterprise’s own business volume, sample, system, and liability boundaries.
The easiest pit to step on.
Build mature account numbers and business modules to pursue new concepts
Just chat interfaces, but no real user tasks.
Ignore that the model will change, and require long-term assessment and product operation
How should we end up receiving and confirming?
The route judgement should output product boundaries, user paths, data masters, interface lists, model tasks, manual nodes and phase budgets.
When preparing to communicate with suppliers or internal teams, it is recommended that current processes, representative samples, existing systems, planning time and budget levels be brought. First, the unknown items are clearly marked, and then the decision is made to use diagnostics, PoC, fixed-range projects or ongoing research and development, which is usually more reliable than a direct demand for a price and duration without borders.