Home / FAQs / Applet and APP filing, uploading and technical selection
QUESTION & ANSWER

App Mini Program Review Rejection

The code, file, privacy policy and actual services must be amended simultaneously. Where rules are not understood, they should be confirmed and recorded through official channels.

Answer the question.

First, give conclusions that can be used for decision-making

The Platform not only checks the availability of the page, but also checks the service catalogue, user entitlements, login experience, privacy privileges, payments and content. The team should establish a rejection list of questions, whether code, operating material or subject, and complete a uniform revision in one version.

DECISION FACTORS

What conditions need to be identified before judgement is made?

The same question may have different answers under different business, data and project phases. It is suggested that the following conditions be checked and that the common findings on the web be incorporated into their own projects.

Dismissed from filing, subject, category, qualification or code reviewThe consistency of privacy policies with SDK, authority and data processingWhether the examiner is able to complete the core process using the test account numberIs there a problem with multi-application markets that needs to be repaired simultaneously?
ACTION STEPS

Suggested order of advance

01

First, we'll be clear about the target and the border.

The notification, version, screenshot and reproduction steps are dismissed in the archives.

02

Validation Key Dependence

The government has also been able to provide a better understanding of the issues and the extent of the problem.

03

Development of assessable outcomes

Consistency changes in codes, materials, test account numbers and instructions completed.

04

Make sure you decide the next step with the real results.

Internal re-examination is followed by resubmission and results are recorded for subsequent editions.

PRACTICAL EXAMPLE

How do you understand it in the actual business?

Example used to illustrate the method of judgement

The APP is denied access to a caller’s address on the basis of a start-up request, and an additional statement of privacy policy cannot be resolved. It should be adjusted to use the function in question, to request permission to explain the use and allow refusal, and to update the policy and the SDK list.

COMMON RISKS

The easiest pit to step on.

Repeated submission of the same version, waste of opportunity for review

Only private files are changed, and the actual code is still over-extended.

Audit test account numbers are not available or core processes cannot be completed

ACCEPTANCE

How should we end up receiving and confirming?

The platform policy may change and the official latest rules will govern its publication.

When preparing to communicate with suppliers or internal teams, it is recommended that current processes, representative samples, existing systems, planning time and budget levels be brought. First, the unknown items are clearly marked, and then the decision is made to use diagnostics, PoC, fixed-range projects or ongoing research and development, which is usually more reliable than a direct demand for a price and duration without borders.

Your project conditions are different from the examples above?

Operational objectives, existing systems, sample and planned time could be collated before consultants could make preliminary judgements in relation to actual boundaries.

Associate project consultants