First, give conclusions that can be used for decision-making
The reasoning service is between model and business applications, and is responsible for output quality and for meeting production engineering requirements. The model version, quantification, context length, sampling configuration, hardware and co-location should be frozen before acceptance, avoiding the uncomparisonability of results under different configurations. In addition to average delay, the high-level delay, time overtime, queue, visible, stale and continuous operation stability should be observed.
What conditions need to be identified before judgement is made?
The same question may have different answers under different business, data and project phases. It is suggested that the following conditions be checked and that the common findings on the web be incorporated into their own projects.
Suggested order of advance
First, we'll be clear about the target and the border.
Freeze the test environment, model configuration and task set.
Validation Key Dependence
Quality, single request, simultaneous distribution and long-term stability tests are performed separately.
Development of assessable outcomes
Simulation of time overruns, model failures, inadequate resources and switchbacks.
Make sure you decide the next step with the real results.
(b) Record capacity baselines, monitoring thresholds and methods of insulation.
How do you understand it in the actual business?
A model interface returns two seconds in a single user test, but delays high-level places by more than 20 seconds and is not visible enough. If you look at averages, you miscalculate usability. Batch processing, queue, model specifications or capacity should be adjusted to real peaks, and the application can be downgraded or converted.
The easiest pit to step on.
Only test interface connectivity and a small number of single user requests
Test models, production models and quantitative configurations not consistent
Without a warning, a capacity baseline and a failure exercise, you're on the line.
How should we end up receiving and confirming?
The final report should record the results of the model and hardware version, mission quality, P50/P95/P99 delay, stowing, error rate, resource occupancy, unit mission cost, running continuity and failure recovery.
When preparing to communicate with suppliers or internal teams, it is recommended that current processes, representative samples, existing systems, planning time and budget levels be brought. First, the unknown items are clearly marked, and then the decision is made to use diagnostics, PoC, fixed-range projects or ongoing research and development, which is usually more reliable than a direct demand for a price and duration without borders.