First, give conclusions that can be used for decision-making
The common boundary is the MES launch process test and the reception of release results, the QMS preservation of complete quality rules, anomalies and corrective measures, the production tasks in which MES records equipment is involved, and EAM manages the service, maintenance and equipment availability. The interface should use uniform products, equipment, worksheets and abnormal numbers, critical states requiring, inter alia, a retest and reconciliation.
What conditions need to be identified before judgement is made?
The same question may have different answers under different business, data and project phases. It is suggested that the following conditions be checked and that the common findings on the web be incorporated into their own projects.
Suggested order of advance
First, we'll be clear about the target and the border.
Draws out the actual processes of production, quality and equipment abnormal.
Validation Key Dependence
Creates a shared object, status and unique number.
Development of assessable outcomes
The end-to-end connection is done with a quality anomaly and equipment failure.
Make sure you decide the next step with the real results.
Additional monitoring, compensation, reconciliation and manual processing queues.
How do you understand it in the actual business?
The MES suspends the work order, QMS creates an unsatisfactory record, EAM generates maintenance work orders; maintenance and quality release allows MES to resume production. Each state should be traced back to the same equipment and worksheets. The examples do not represent the performance of a particular client, and the actual conclusions need to be verified in conjunction with the enterprise’s own business volume, sample, system and liability boundaries.
The easiest pit to step on.
Three systems maintain equipment and product codes, respectively
The interface is successful, and it's considered closed.
The MES was not returned after maintenance was completed or mass release
How should we end up receiving and confirming?
The acceptance shall cover normal production, unsatisfactory inspection, equipment shutdown, completion of maintenance, return and release, and verify authority, repeat messages, interface timeout and compensation in the same condition as the end state.
When preparing to communicate with suppliers or internal teams, it is recommended that current processes, representative samples, existing systems, planning time and budget levels be brought. First, the unknown items are clearly marked, and then the decision is made to use diagnostics, PoC, fixed-range projects or ongoing research and development, which is usually more reliable than a direct demand for a price and duration without borders.