First, give conclusions that can be used for decision-making
The results of the model must be linked to actual removal, review, worksheets or retroactive records, and only the correct operational state will account for the task. The on-site test also involves observing changes in light, stains, vibrations, equipment ageing and new batches.
What conditions need to be identified before judgement is made?
The same question may have different answers under different business, data and project phases. It is suggested that the following conditions be checked and that the common findings on the web be incorporated into their own projects.
Suggested order of advance
First, we'll be clear about the target and the border.
Establishment of a matrix of risk and treatment of deficiencies by operational and quality personnel.
Validation Key Dependence
Freezing of independent test sets and identification of data sources and assessment environments.
Development of assessable outcomes
Conduct offline assessments, performance tests and continuous on-site testing, respectively.
Make sure you decide the next step with the real results.
Check manual review, abnormal retreat, business writing and version return.
How do you understand it in the actual business?
The project must separately measure the rate of recall of critical deficiencies, while recording the return of work caused by normal product miscalculation. If a certain type of defect cannot be identified in a stable manner, it should enter manual review or improve camera light sources, rather than be masked by the overall average.
The easiest pit to step on.
Training set and collections with similar continuum frames lead to a low result
Reporting only overall accuracy rate, and not critical deficiencies
The model was offline, but no interface between field equipment and operations was validated
How should we end up receiving and confirming?
The receiving and inspection report should include data versions, category definitions, class-by-class confusion, leak error screening, performance, conditions on the ground, manual review and operational system results.
When preparing to communicate with suppliers or internal teams, it is recommended that current processes, representative samples, existing systems, planning time and budget levels be brought. First, the unknown items are clearly marked, and then the decision is made to use diagnostics, PoC, fixed-range projects or ongoing research and development, which is usually more reliable than a direct demand for a price and duration without borders.