Home / FAQs / Software development and outsourcing of projects
QUESTION & ANSWER

How to Choose Shanghai Software Outsourcing Company

It is important to see whether the supplier can translate business issues into scope, risk and acceptance criteria, rather than company size and sales rhetoric. While local communication in Shanghai facilitates complex process interviews and online collaboration, code quality, project management and ongoing maintenance are still subject to proof. It is recommended that the other party be asked to explain the structure, delivery, unusual handling and takeover of similar projects.

Answer the question.

First, give conclusions that can be used for decision-making

When selecting a Shanghai software outsourcing company, the main subject, team role and delivery responsibility should be checked, followed by case and technology. True suppliers will be proactive in asking about business volume, user role, existing systems, interfaces, data and online constraints, and will point to those that cannot be committed temporarily.

DECISION FACTORS

What conditions need to be identified before judgement is made?

The same question may have different answers under different business, data and project phases. It is suggested that the following conditions be checked and that the common findings on the web be incorporated into their own projects.

Consistency between business, contract, collection and actual delivery teamsDemonstrate verifiable stage results, code management and testing processesWhether the quotations are clear of the items, the exclusions, the customer ' s cooperation and the change mechanismWho controls the source code, data, domain names, cloud resources and third-party accounts
ACTION STEPS

Suggested order of advance

01

First, we'll be clear about the target and the border.

Three to five vendors were contacted in the same project summary to ensure consistency of comparison.

02

Validation Key Dependence

A joint business-technical communication was arranged to allow the actual responsible person to answer the structural and risk questions.

03

Development of assessable outcomes

Samples of dissensitized delivery items, such as demand catalogues, interface files and test reports, are requested.

04

Make sure you decide the next step with the real results.

First, a diagnosis or first milestone, and whether to expand the scope based on genuine collaborative results.

PRACTICAL EXAMPLE

How do you understand it in the actual business?

Example used to illustrate the method of judgement

The company needs to connect to ERP, site equipment, and mobile end. Several companies claim to do it when looking at the page, but in the interface inventory review, teams that can proactively identify equipment offline, data feed, access and back-up are more worthy of entering the next round.

COMMON RISKS

The easiest pit to step on.

The number of personnel, the number of years of establishment, and the direct equivalence of the current project

Accept a price without a limit and acceptance note

Sales were well communicated, but the actual team never participated in the prior assessment after the signing

ACCEPTANCE

How should we end up receiving and confirming?

The assessment of eligible suppliers should include, at a minimum, a requirement understanding, scope of recommendations, technical routes, project roles, milestones, delivery lists, risk and pricing assumptions.

When preparing to communicate with suppliers or internal teams, it is recommended that current processes, representative samples, existing systems, planning time and budget levels be brought. First, the unknown items are clearly marked, and then the decision is made to use diagnostics, PoC, fixed-range projects or ongoing research and development, which is usually more reliable than a direct demand for a price and duration without borders.

Your project conditions are different from the examples above?

Operational objectives, existing systems, sample and planned time could be collated before consultants could make preliminary judgements in relation to actual boundaries.

Associate project consultants